LB - Northland Motorsports

Home | Classifieds | Place an Ad | Public Notices | Galleries | Milestones | Contact Us | Subscribe | e-newsletter | RSS | GrandCanyonTourGuide.com
Navajo-Hopi Observer | Flagstaff, Arizona

home : latest news : latest news May 27, 2016


6/3/2014 10:02:00 AM
Developers say Escalade project at Colorado River confluence on track
Looking upstream on the Colorado River from above the confluence. Confluence Partners, L.L.C. hopes to build a gondola from the canyon rim to the river as part of the Grand Canyon Escalade development on the western edge of the Navajo reservation at the confluence of the Colorado and Little Colorado rivers. Photo/Confluence Partners
Looking upstream on the Colorado River from above the confluence. Confluence Partners, L.L.C. hopes to build a gondola from the canyon rim to the river as part of the Grand Canyon Escalade development on the western edge of the Navajo reservation at the confluence of the Colorado and Little Colorado rivers. Photo/Confluence Partners
The view of the confluence from the location Confluence Partners hopes to build a visitors plaza. Photo/ Confluence Partners
The view of the confluence from the location Confluence Partners hopes to build a visitors plaza. Photo/ Confluence Partners

Katherine Locke
Reporter


FLAGSTAFF, Ariz. - According to officials with the Grand Canyon Escalade development, this project is on track to go before the Navajo Nation Council for approval in June or at the latest in July.

If the project gets council approval by the end of June, and the project gets through the permitting process, the project's developers plan to begin construction in the summer of 2015 with the goal to begin operation in May 2017. The Navajo Nation took over leasing requirements from the Bureau of Indian Affairs, meaning approval and permits for a project like this comes from the Navajo Nation.

Confluence Partners, the project developer, refined the project to 420 acres located on the western edge of the Navajo reservation at the confluence of the Colorado and Little Colorado rivers. The area is located about 100 miles by road from Interstate 40 and Flagstaff, Arizona.

The development's main attraction would be an eight-person gondola tramway, which would deliver visitors to the Canyon floor in about 10 minutes. The length of the tramway is approximately 1.6 miles with about a 3,200 foot descent. A river walk with an elevated walkway would be constructed on the Canyon floor with a food pavilion.

On the rim, a Navajoland Discovery Center, which would be overseen by an advisory board, has been added with an eye toward telling stories of Navajos' and other tribes' relationships to the Canyon. In addition, a multimedia complex and an estimated 47,000 square feet of retail and restaurants would be located on the rim. Future development could include a lodge hotel, boutique hotel, multiple midlevel motels (all of which could total about 900 rooms), an RV park and a general store.

An all-weather paved road would be constructed. Water, power and infrastructure would also be available for the local chapter to build a community about half-way out to the site.

Water for the project would come from Bodaway Gap.

R. Lamar Whitmer, managing partner of Confluence Partners, said over the last year and a half he believes opposition to the project from Navajos has lessened. In meetings with Navajo Nation lawyers, Whitmer said the lawyers said the Nation has every right to develop this area.

The president's office referred the Observer to Deswood Tome as a contact for this project. Calls and emails to Tome regarding the perspective of the administration and the Navajo Nation on the Escalade project were not returned.

Navajo Nation and economic development

The Navajo Nation will pay for the off sites, meaning they will lease the property to the Navajo Hospitality Enterprise. The Escalade project has a development agreement with the Hospitality Enterprise which will be titled to the Navajo Nation. The Escalade development will have a 50 year operating agreement.

"We have the right to operate it," Whitmer said.

According to the project partners, economic development is driving the Grand Canyon Escalade project and its location.

"It's about the people," Whitmer said. "The people in the Bennett Freeze area are suffering. They have 60-70 percent unemployment. You have people delaying this project when the need is so great. My main concern now is making sure we get it done on a timely basis so we don't lose another year of payroll for these folks."

Eunice Tso, another Confluence project management team member, said the leaders and delegates of the Navajo Nation want economic development, too, and are looking for ways other than coal to diversify the economy.

"The western side of the reservation does not have some of the same opportunities as the eastern side does," she said.

Agreements between project partners and the Navajo Nation specify a Navajo hiring preference. Whitmer estimates initially 2,000 people will be hired on site during construction with another 1,500 people hired once operations begin.

"We intend to spend a significant amount of money on job training, on scholarships and giving back to the community," he said.

Rumors of a casino in the area are untrue, Whitmer said, although he acknowledged that Navajo leadership has talked about it.

"We don't want a casino at this place," he said. "It would be inappropriate. Early on we decided that was not the way to go. Just like we decided we don't want an airport."

Whitmer estimated that 98 percent of the South Rim Grand Canyon business is by car and the 2 percent is air tours and busses.

"We made the decision an airport is more trouble than it's worth," he said.

Hopi and the confluence

Whitmer said the area the Hopi tribe considers sacred, the confluence of the Little Colorado and the Colorado rivers, would not be affected. He said the development of Grand Canyon Escalade will not be anywhere near their eagles' nests, the Hopi Salt Trail or springs in the area despite the Hopi belief that it will.

"We want the Hopi to understand we are not desecrating their part of the Canyon," Whitmer said.

Tso said the protection of cultural areas of each tribe is mandated in the 2006 intergovernmental compact between the two tribes and she believes the development is within the confines of the compact.

"I don't know what other concerns they may have other than saying the whole general area is sacred," Tso said.

Leigh Kuwanwisiwma is the director of the Hopi Cultural Preservation Office. He is also the formal agent of notice on the intergovernmental compact signed and approved by both the Navajo and Hopi tribal councils. He is the point of contact on any issues that may arise on provisions in the compact.

"One of the things that is very significant that affects the Escalade project is upfront the compact is intended to recognize the members of each tribes' religious rights on each other's lands," he said

Kuwanwisiwma said the Hopi tribe secured a list of Navajo sacred sites on the Hopi reservation and agreed to work with the Navajo Nation to give its members access to those sites in perpetuity. The Hopi tribe provided a list of its sacred sites located on the Navajo reservation to the Navajo Nation and expected the same. Those lists are each filed in federal court.

"The language I am looking at is that each tribe is to protect each other's sacred sites," Kuwanwisiwma said. "That was the agreement. It was really the way the tribes decided to settle out of court the land disputes."

One of the areas listed for the Hopi is the confluence. The Hopi Salt Trail is a central part of the Hopi's religious beliefs. The Salt Trail goes from the Hopi villages down into the Grand Canyon. The confluence is significant because that is where the Salt Trail enters the bigger Canyon and is part of the pilgrimages. The confluence is also spiritually important to the Hopi because it is the tribe's final resting place.

Kuwanwisiwma said the Navajo Nation should be fully aware that the confluence is part of the Hopi tribe's initial property claim against the Navajo Nation and when the compact was negotiated it was clear that that area was a sacred site that the Navajo Nation needed to protect.

"To now propose to hang a gondola down into the confluence was unacceptable to the Hopi people, totally unacceptable," Kuwanwisiwma said.

Supporters of the Escalade project contend the area is already used by river runners who stop at the confluence as part of river trips. Kuwanwisiwma said he believes there are 19 companies that run tours down the river in the Canyon.

"We're quite aware that one of the stopping areas is the confluence," he said. "But to use that argument against the Hopi is really unfair. Again, the issue on that is longstanding as far as the National Park Service permitting those tour companies down there."

In the early 90s, after he was elected, Kuwanwisiwma considered the tours stopping at the confluence and making hikes up the Little Colorado River, which is where the Hopi Salt Trail is. Half of the trail is in Park Service jurisdiction and the other part of the trail to the confluence is on the Navajo reservation. Former Hopi Chairman Ivan Sydney in the 90s formally asked the Park Service to limit hiking up the Little Colorado River by commercial tours.

"That was agreed to by the Park Service," Kuwanwisiwma said. "There are no more commercial hikes or tours sponsored by the tour companies going up the Little Colorado River Gorge."

But the Navajo Nation allows recreational hikes on the Hopi Salt Trail even though they have been alerted that the Hopi consider it a sacred site.

"In terms of the record of concern by Hopi, it is longstanding regarding the confluence," Kuwanwisiwma said. "The partners are really unfair to compare the Hopi tribe's effort at the confluence by comparing their development and the commercial river tours."

He added that the Hopi tribe has appeared before the river guides' river association at their trainings to express their concern and educate the river rafters about the significance of the confluence and the river to the Hopi people.

According to Kuwanwisiwma, Hopi Tribal Chairman Herman Honanie met privately with Navajo Nation President Ben Shelly on Feb. 10 in Window Rock. Honanie hand delivered a letter to Shelly requesting that Shelly and Arizona State Rep. Albert Hale, who is another management team member on the project, appear before the Hopi tribe. The letter asked that the Navajo Nation Council delay any action on the new master agreement for the Escalade project.

The Hopi tribe has not seen the new master agreement. Because of a confidentiality agreement with the confluence partners, Shelly said he was unable to release it to the Hopi. According to Kuwanwisiwma, Shelly has not responded to the invitation to appear before the Hopi tribe.

Kuwanwisiwma said his personal position, as director for the Hopi tribe's cultural preservation office and someone who was on the negotiating team for the compact, is if the Navajo Nation proceeds with the development without any consultation with the Hopi tribe, the Nation will willfully violate the provisions of the compact.

"There's a Hopi shrine right at the confluence that continues to be visited today," Kuwanwisiwma said. "As an agent of notice I take it pretty seriously how our office is committed to protecting Navajo sites on Hopi. Why aren't the Navajos doing it as far as the Escalade and the confluence? That is my direct question to President Shelly. He needs to answer to the Hopi people on that."

Bodaway Chapter vote

The Bodaway Chapter voted to approve the project on Oct. 3, 2012. Both Whitmer and Kuwanwisiwma, who said he was present at the meeting, said the vote was controversial.

"They questioned whether or not we had the votes, we questioned whether their vote was skewed," Whitmer said.

Kuwanwisiwma, in a write up of the meeting he sent to the Observer said that the vote taking was haphazard and unorganized. He said the final vote was recorded as 59 in favor and 52 opposed.

"My vote was counted, yet I am not an enrolled member of the Navajo tribe or a voting member of either chapter," Kuwanwisiwma said. "Based on this, shouldn't the results be called into question?"

Light pollution

Whitmer said the development partners are aware that light pollution is a concern to people who visit the Grand Canyon for a dark sky experience. The site can be seen with the naked eye from five view points on the east side of the Canyon.

"We're going to be sensitive," Whitmer said. "We're not going to borrow the laser from the Luxor. We're not going to put light shows on. We're going to try and minimize the light pollution."

Also, Whitmer said in Navajo culture constellations are important and the idea is to tell some of those stories to the public.

"It's a selling point," he said.

National Park Service

Whitmer said he will consult with the National Park Service when the agreement is done and the Navajo Nation Council approves it.

"We weren't far enough along to really go talk to them," he said. "Our documents are in the legislative process with the Nation and we're hopeful to have the Council act on it in June or July."

Whitmer said the Grand Canyon Escalade project will deal with development at the site in the same way that the National Park Service operates Grand Canyon National Park.

"After our first site visit, we agreed to go with an elevated walkway [at the bottom of the Canyon] because it is less intrusive and it's not going to disturb things," he said. "It allows us to control the grounds better. We pirated that from the Park Service."

In addition, the site will have self-contained wastewater and recirculating gray water.

"We're going to try and minimize the water use down there," Whitmer said. "We don't anticipate the [tramway] being operated at night. Phantom Ranch is 14 or 15 acres and we're three."

Project partners are considering whether they will have a storytelling amphitheater on the upstream side of the walkway but Whitmer said there will not be a restaurant.

"We want them to have prepared food and if they want to have a latte and watch the river go by, we invite them to do that," he said.

Whitmer said the goal is to not be dependent on summer visitors alone but to attract winter visitors to the Southwest as well.

Outreach

Whitmer said outreach to Flagstaff and surrounding communities will begin this summer. He anticipates push back against the development will come from both environmental groups and business groups.

"I believe that is when you do outreach [after the deal is done]," Whitmer said. "I've talked to the river guides. I understand. They have a monopoly on people who want to see the Canyon from the bottom. If you don't want to hike or ride a mule, the only other choice you have is to take a river trip. I understand people who have business concerns because right now they have a regulated monopoly. Why would you want to have people cut into that?"

Tso said she is open to dialogue with groups to find out what their issues with the project may be.

"Is it aesthetics? What can we do about that?" Tso asked. "Can we paint the gondolas to blend in with the rock formations? Can we go with their recommendations for lighting?"

Whitmer said the development group is open to talking and hearing suggestions for design and cutting edge building practices.

"We're going to minimize the impact of the development," he said. "We'll be more environmentally sensitive than the South Rim is."

Discovery center

Whitmer said he wants all tribes who have a connection to the Grand Canyon to be a part of the stories told at the Navajoland Discovery Center. He said he is excited about the opportunity for visitors to learn about native cultures and their creation stories.

"We anticipate that people will spend four or five hours here and get a cultural experience, see the Canyon from the bottom up," Whitmer said. "We want them to be enriched."

"We want [the Hopi] to be a part of the Discovery Center, he added.

However, Kuwanwisiwma asked how anyone can articulate the importance of an area when it is destroyed.

"I've been at the confluence many times looking out over the Canyon and it is an inspiration to be there but it is also a recognition that that is our final resting place," Kuwanwisiwma said. "How can you even dare to suggest that, through some kind of public venue, you're going to try and educate the public about the importance of [this area] when you destroy it? That kind of suggestion is an affront to the Hopi people."







Related Stories:
• Development or preservation: Opponents of Escalade development at Confluence say project not good for families in Bennett Freeze area


    Recently Commented     Most Viewed
Mapmaker continues quest to document indigenous cultures
New documentary focuses on Native American veterans on Navajo Nation
Letter to the editor: Where do children learn to speak fluent Navajo?
Delegate Edmund Yazzie continues work for Thoreau, N.M. clinic
Pirates of the Navajo Nation under attack


Reader Comments

Posted: Sunday, June 29, 2014
Article comment by: Serpent's Tongue

How appropriate that the confluence of two great rivers is shaped like the serpent's tongue.

The words of Confluence Partners and Mr. Whitmer need no great scrutiny to determine that they speak with the forkest of tongues.

Their concern with ANYONE's interest but their own financial welfare reek of phony. Yet they have convinced the gullible of their purported sincerity

History repeats itself repeats itself repeats itself.


Posted: Tuesday, June 24, 2014
Article comment by: What Ever

The bigger question is why is the Navajo Nation Govt who claims to know the traditional values of Dine.... persuading us to agree. Elections are coming up..... no matter what tribe you are, this is a big issue and you go where ever there is a "Navajo" running for office and ask "what is your opinion on the confluence." My personal "Whatever" opinion is... when do we stop being victims for the Navajo Nation Government and the US Government and stand up to be Dine? It is time to hold the NN Govt and the US Govt accountable for THEIR actions.

Posted: Monday, June 16, 2014
Article comment by: Pauline Sanchez

We have been standing against this proposed project because 1-they are building on and near sacred sites. 2-the Confluence Partners will be the ones in control and will be getting the big bucks. The Navajo people will get the scrapes. 3-They say they want more than the 420 acres. In the MOU signed on Feb. 21, 3012, it is 5,167 acres. On the letters of intent, it is 3,130 + areas of grazing and land use of those who have grazing or home site leases.4-there are other questions about the land. 5-the lack of development or management experience of Mr. LaMar Whitmer, a political consultant from Scottsdale. He has been in trouble over the Maricopa County Sports Authority over unauthorized compensation from the tax supported group. Michael Nelson also had some legal troubles. Albert Hales also resigned before facing charges in court. There are public records of these situations. 6-damaging of beautiful pristine land. Please check their website-caution! The update misrepresents who will be the true winners and losers.

Posted: Saturday, June 7, 2014
Article comment by: A Bomb

Everyone opposing this needs to band together - be they Navajo, Hopi, or white. This plan is a horrible idea, and with the uncertainty regarding the true National Park boundary along the east side of the river, it honestly makes me nervous. This site should remain pristine and wild for all time. Although I'm just plain white folk, I've been there twice and this place holds special meaning to me. If we're going to allow this, why not jut build an escalator to the summit of Everest or put amusement park rides in all of Europe's important historical and religious sites. All for greed....

Posted: Thursday, June 5, 2014
Article comment by: Gary Barnes

Ms. Locke has done a good job writing about this situation.

Would the Navajo politicians consider the same type of project at Dzil Na'oodilii, Ch'oolii, or Naatsis'n? If the answer is 'No' then why do this here in a place just as Holy to the Hopi People?

Someone needs to follow the money trail to discover why some are no longer following a path of Harmony. The Navajo politicians know how this land was taken from the Hopi and given over to the Navajo. Please do not let greed be your master. Please respect the Hopi traditions in the same fashion that you would have others respect the Dine.


Posted: Wednesday, June 4, 2014
Article comment by: Better opportunity for econ development on I-40

Quite frankly, if economic development is the justification, then the I-40 corridor is a much more profitable place to do it.

Way out at the confluence, with all its inherent difficulties and environmental impacts, makes no sense at all, and especially from a profit standpoint.

I-40 has a locked in market virtually 24/7/365 that the Navajo Nation can easily and cost effectively tap into, without the kinds of environment and cultural impacts and increased costs of development in such a remote location as the confluence.

So for the developers to cite econ development really amounts to a straw man argument.

For jobs and more opportunity for the Navajo people, it would be far more profitable, less environmentally harmful, and much more cost effective for the the Nation to invest in projects along the I-40 corridor.


Posted: Wednesday, June 4, 2014
Article comment by: What Ever

Why don't they create the "Resort/Tourist" facility in Window Rock...... land of the Crooks!

Posted: Wednesday, June 4, 2014
Article comment by: Keith Lamparter

I think this project is badly needed in the area. For anyone that has been to Cameron and the Gap there is nothing there but poverty. Nothing has been done to fix the disaster of the Bennett Freeze since Obama signed the legislation lifting the Freeze. People need home sites and for home sites you need roads, power, water and JOBS. I hear all the stuff about saving the environment and saving the Grand Canyon but nobody is doing anything to save the people that live there. They are forgotten at worst and thrown handouts and platitudes at best. While the project has some drawbacks, I think you have too look at the big picture. If this project moves forward this area becomes a boom town of jobs and commerce. It will mean stores and restaurants and hotels on 89 (which means JOBS) and it will allow for new home sites and power and water to existing home sites and ranches. The majority of the people that live in this area support the project because they want to make a living and they want their kids to stop having to move way to Flagstaff or Phoenix. The people trying to stop it all live good lives in nice cities for the the most part. Easy for them to cry fowl and save the planet. And the whole Sacred Sites stuff is all to scare folks. The people should be sacred too.

Posted: Tuesday, June 3, 2014
Article comment by: Klee Benally

If we sacrifice our culture by desecrating sacred places for economic gain, who have we become? The Navajo Nation should not be complicit to this desecration or it perpetuates a hypocrisy that risks undoing decades of work to protect other sacred places such as the San Francisco Peaks.

Posted: Tuesday, June 3, 2014
Article comment by: Wayne Ranney

If the Navajo Nation wants to build a resort/tourist facility at the canyon, let them do it on land that is unequivocally Navajo! There are plenty of narrow canyon places upstream from the confluence. They can have everything they want - without any lawsuits from the Hopi Tribe or the National Park Service. The boundary between the reservation and the national park exists one-quarter mile back from the high water mark of the Colorado River. That was determined with the creation of the old Marble Canyon National Monument.

The Little Colorado River Gorge Tribal Park is the best place for this development.




Article Comment Submission Form
Comments are not posted immediately. Submissions must adhere to our Use of Service Terms of Use agreement. The email and phone info you provide will not be visible to the public. Rambling or nonsensical comments may not be posted. Comments are limited to 1300 characters or less. In order for us to reasonably manage this feature we may limit your comment entries to five(5) per day.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Required
Last Name:
Required
Telephone:
Required
Email:
Required
Comment:
Required
Passcode:
Required
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.
   


Advanced Search

HSE - We want to hear from you
Find more about Weather in Flagstaff, AZ
Click for weather forecast





Submission links
 •  Submit site feedback or questions

Find It Opinions Features Submit Extras Other Publications
Home | Classifieds | Place an Ad | Public Notices | Galleries | Milestones | Contact Us | Subscribe | e-newsletter | RSS | Site Map
LB - Northland Motorsports

© Copyright 2016 Western News&Info, Inc.® The Navajo-Hopi Observer is the information source for the Navajo and Hopi Nations and Winslow area communities in Northern Arizona. Original content may not be reprinted or distributed without the written permission of Western News&Info, Inc.® Navajo-Hopi Observer Online is a service of WNI. By using the Site, nhonews.com ®, you agree to abide and be bound by the site's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which prohibit commercial use of any information on the site. Click here to submit your questions, comments or suggestions. Navajo-Hopi Observer Online is a proud publication of Western News&Info Inc.® All Rights Reserved.

Software © 1998-2016 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved