LB - Northland Motorsports

Home | Classifieds | Place an Ad | Public Notices | Galleries | Milestones | Contact Us | Subscribe | e-newsletter | RSS | GrandCanyonTourGuide.com
Navajo-Hopi Observer | Flagstaff, Arizona

home : latest news : regional May 24, 2016


7/23/2013 10:31:00 AM
Indian Child Welfare Act not a factor in adoption decision
Katherine Locke
Reporter

WASHINGTON - A Cherokee father is outraged because the South Carolina Supreme Court ordered him to turn over his biological daughter to a couple seeking to adopt her after the U.S. Supreme Court decided that the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) played no role in the case.

On July 17, in a 3-2 decision, the court instructed the lower court to formalize the adoption of the girl at which time the father would have to hand over the girl to the couple.

The Supreme Court of South Carolina reversed its original decision in favor of the father and decided without ICWA and in compliance with the U.S. Supreme Court decision, the father had not established paternity because he never had custody of the girl and had not provided financial support to the mother before the child was put up for adoption.

At the center of the case is a little girl named Veronica. Her father, Dusten Brown, is Cherokee and according to the Cherokee nation, so is his daughter. But he was estranged from the mother and he never had custody of Veronica before the court placed her with Brown.

When the mother put Veronica up for adoption, Brown contested the adoption on the grounds that he was not properly notified in accordance with ICWA and he won his case in trial court and on appeal with the state supreme court. The courts in South Carolina said that Brown's paternity was established and took Veronica away from the presumptive adoptive parents, Matt and Melanie Capobiancos, and placed her in Brown's care.

In its recent decision, the U.S. Supreme Court said the heightened standard for proof of termination of parental rights does not apply when a parent has never had prior legal or physical custody. The court also found that active efforts to comply with ICWA to not break up an Indian family do not apply when a parent abandons a child before birth and again has never had legal or physical custody of a child.

"We are outraged that the South Carolina Supreme Court would order the adoption of our child finalized without a proper hearing to determine what is in Veronica's best interests," Brown said. "This child has been back with her family for 19 months and to tear her away from us, the family she loves and the only family she knows or remembers, would be devastating to her. This is an Oklahoma child and her placement should not be considered by a court in South Carolina. We have contacted our U.S. Senator and encourage each of you to do the same, in order to help us keep Veronica in her home, which is a safe, loving and nurturing environment. We will never give up the fight to raise our daughter."

The Cherokee Nation questioned why the court would order the transfer of the child without a hearing about what was in the girl's best interests considering that the very same court had originally decided that Brown was a fit and loving parent and that Veronica was "safe, loved and cared for" by Brown.

Echoing those statements, the National Indian Child Welfare Association (NICWA) said by failing to send the case back to family court-other than for that court to finalize the adoption -the South Carolina Court was not acting in a manner consistent with the U.S. Supreme Court's decision.

"While the Indian Child Welfare Act was not overturned and still stands as law, the decision by the South Carolina Supreme Court yesterday sends a chilling message," the statement read.

The National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) said there is no scenario in which the best interests of Veronica would be served by removing her from her loving father and family who are raising her in Oklahoma.

"A removal of the child will be extremely traumatic for her and is clearly not in her best interests," NGAI's statement said. "We are witnessing the final steps in a forced removal of a Native child from her father, her family and her Native community."

The U.S. government enacted ICWA in 1978 because of the high number of Indian children public and private agencies removed from their Indian homes. The act gives relatives of the children and the tribes a say in what happens to Indian children. The act was designed to preserve Indian culture and heritage.

"Some who fiercely assert the evils of ICWA contend that all children should be treated equally and therefore ICWA should be dismantled," said Terry Cross, executive director of the NICWA. "This argument sounds reasonable to those unfamiliar with the long history that led to ICWA's passage. At that time 25-30 percent of all American Indian children were removed from their homes... 80 percent were placed, often permanently, in white homes."

The South Carolina court allowed five days for an appeal citing the need for this case to be resolved and for Veronica's future to be decided.






    Recently Commented     Most Viewed
Mapmaker continues quest to document indigenous cultures
New documentary focuses on Native American veterans on Navajo Nation
Letter to the editor: Where do children learn to speak fluent Navajo?
Delegate Edmund Yazzie continues work for Thoreau, N.M. clinic
Pirates of the Navajo Nation under attack


Reader Comments

Posted: Thursday, July 25, 2013
Article comment by: Brigitte Dreischer

Sir,

It is shameful to witness how little the Human Rights of Native Americans are respected in the United States who look upon themselves as a democratic nation. The impression they create in an international framework is to be a nation of applied racism. They do not oppress Native Americans, they strive at extinguishing them altogether. Happy Columbus.




Article Comment Submission Form
Comments are not posted immediately. Submissions must adhere to our Use of Service Terms of Use agreement. The email and phone info you provide will not be visible to the public. Rambling or nonsensical comments may not be posted. Comments are limited to 1300 characters or less. In order for us to reasonably manage this feature we may limit your comment entries to five(5) per day.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Required
Last Name:
Required
Telephone:
Required
Email:
Required
Comment:
Required
Passcode:
Required
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.
   


Advanced Search

HSE - We want to hear from you
Find more about Weather in Flagstaff, AZ
Click for weather forecast





Submission links
 •  Submit site feedback or questions

Find It Opinions Features Submit Extras Other Publications
Home | Classifieds | Place an Ad | Public Notices | Galleries | Milestones | Contact Us | Subscribe | e-newsletter | RSS | Site Map
LB - Northland Motorsports

© Copyright 2016 Western News&Info, Inc.® The Navajo-Hopi Observer is the information source for the Navajo and Hopi Nations and Winslow area communities in Northern Arizona. Original content may not be reprinted or distributed without the written permission of Western News&Info, Inc.® Navajo-Hopi Observer Online is a service of WNI. By using the Site, nhonews.com ®, you agree to abide and be bound by the site's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which prohibit commercial use of any information on the site. Click here to submit your questions, comments or suggestions. Navajo-Hopi Observer Online is a proud publication of Western News&Info Inc.® All Rights Reserved.

Software © 1998-2016 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved